A bit of text to accompany the photographs and quotes that I hope gives context to the work. This is the first of two pieces, the next will attempt to answer my question.
When you ruminate, it means you think deeply about
something. It can also mean to chew the
cud, to chat. Either way, it’s a process
not to be rushed. Through conversations
with peers and time to return to previous projects, the Extend leadership
programme has been an opportunity to ruminate, in both senses. Through a group project we discussed our work
and asked questions of each other. The
group members encompassed many roles, areas of interest and skill. We didn’t form a homogenous project; instead
we supported each other to pursue our interests.
The questioning process has been particularly useful in
reflecting on our participatory work and reflects my overall learning from the
course. Recurring phrases in my
notebooks read “ask questions”, “be curious”.
The enquiring, not the answering has been hugely beneficial as a way to
open discussion, consider different perspectives and return to overlooked
details - often with the outcome of further questions.
The question I was posed by the group was “how to put art at
the centre of access?” Much of my work
is collaborative, bringing artists and participants together around a common
point of interest. It’s a process that
values and benefits from the diverse experiences and ideas of everyone
involved. In thinking about my question,
I returned to previous conversations I have had with participants and
artists. I found many points of wisdom
and insight about the way projects are set up, how people are involved, the
attitudes of the artists and what taking part means for people.
There is not one answer to the question how to put art at
the centre of access, but among the wealth of information, there were several
points that I find useful to keep in mind.
These are presented here with extracts from the conversations and
photographs representing that time shared, ruminating.
No comments:
Post a Comment